William Burke v. Warden
WILLIAM BURKE |
WARDEN |
21-11224 |
April 9, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's brief filed by William Burke. Service date: 05/25/2021 [21-11224] Attorney for Appellee: Crowder - email; Attorney for Appellee: Smith - email. [Entered: 06/03/2021 11:27 AM] |
MOTION to expand certificate of appealability filed by Appellant William Burke. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9400789-1] [Entered: 06/03/2021 07:56 AM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant William Burke. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9392270-1] [Entered: 05/21/2021 03:44 PM] |
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William Burke. [Entered: 05/06/2021 04:22 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William Burke. [Entered: 05/04/2021 04:44 PM] |
Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant, requesting case status. [Entered: 05/04/2021 04:36 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William Burke. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/26/2021 08:33 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant William Burke. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/01/2021. [Entered: 04/26/2021 08:30 AM] |
USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant William Burke was filed on 04/21/2021. Docket Entry 56. [Entered: 04/23/2021 04:23 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Crowder for Warden. [21-11224] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 04/21/2021 09:02 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Crowder for Appellee Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11224] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 04/21/2021 01:51 PM] |
USDC order granting COA as to Appellant William Burke was filed on 03/22/2021. Docket Entry 50. [Entered: 04/15/2021 02:28 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant William Burke on 04/08/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/15/2021 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Burke v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: WILLIAM BURKE | |
Represented By: | William Burke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN | |
Represented By: | Paula Khristian Smith |
Represented By: | Matthew Crowder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.