Monteria Robinson v. William Sauls, et al
| SERVICE |
| MONTERIA NAJUDA ROBINSON, as the natural parent of Jamarion Rashad Robinson, and The of Estate of Jamarion Rashad Robinson |
| ERIC HEINZE, JOSHUA MAUNEY, SANTEZ KINDRED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM SAULS, STEVE O'HARE, PAMELA J. DOYLE, STEVE SCHRECKENGOST and KRISTOPHER HUTCHENS |
| 21-11280 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Monteria Najuda Robinson v. William Sauls, et al
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andrew Dill Menefee for Monteria Najuda Robinson [21-11280] (ECF: Mario Williams) [Entered: 05/24/2021 09:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Katherine Anne Cantolina for Monteria Najuda Robinson [21-11280] (ECF: Mario Williams) [Entered: 05/24/2021 09:35 AM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/05/2021 06:22 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mario Bernard Williams for Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11280] (ECF: Mario Williams) [Entered: 04/27/2021 06:27 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Mario Bernard Williams for Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson. [21-11280] (ECF: Mario Williams) [Entered: 04/27/2021 05:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mario Bernard Williams for Monteria Najuda Robinson. [21-11280] (ECF: Mario Williams) [Entered: 04/26/2021 03:05 PM] |
| Appellant's brief is currently due on 05/24/2021. Over the phone 28 day extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Mario Bernard Williams for Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson. Appellant's brief is now due on 06/21/2021; Appendix due on 06/28/2021 as to Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson. [Entered: 04/26/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Gabriel Adam Mendel for Appellees Pamela J. Doyle, Eric Heinze, Kristopher Hutchens, Santez Kindred, Joshua Mauney, Steve O'Hare, William Sauls, Steve Schreckengost and USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11280] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 04/22/2021 10:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Darcy F. Coty for William Sauls et al. [21-11280] (ECF: Darcy Coty) [Entered: 04/22/2021 01:42 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gabriel A. Mendel for William Sauls et al. [21-11280] (ECF: Gabriel Mendel) [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:08 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson on 04/13/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/24/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/05/2021 as to Appellant Monteria Najuda Robinson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/19/2021 as to Appellee William Sauls [Entered: 04/21/2021 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
