USA v. Miguel Molina
| MIGUEL ANTHONY MOLINA, a.k.a. Pito |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-11291 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC endorsed order denying IFP as to Appellant Miguel Anthony Molina was filed on 04/27/2021. Docket Entry 114. [Entered: 04/28/2021 01:49 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Miguel Anthony Molina on 04/19/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 04/23/2021 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Miguel Molina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MIGUEL ANTHONY MOLINA, a.k.a. Pito | |
| Represented By: | Miguel Anthony Molina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
