Mark Mann v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, E. PEREZ PEREZ, CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, A Florida limited liability company, C. CALDERON, Dr., CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and M. REMIREZ, PA Doctor |
| MARK MANN |
| 21-11445 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Mark Mann v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Mark Mann is GRANTED. [ # 9400123-2 ] Appellants brief due on 07/07/2021. RSR (See attached order for complete text) --[Edited 06/08/2021 by TLR] [Entered: 06/08/2021 04:15 PM]
|
| MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 07/07/2021 filed by Mark Mann. Motion is Unopposed. [9400123-1] [21-11445] (ECF: Gary Printy) [Entered: 06/02/2021 12:54 PM] |
| 2nd request-Notice of deficient Transcript Order Information form filed by Gary Lee Printy for Mark Mann. Incorrect Event used (Appearance of Counsel) to file document. Counsel shall resubmit the TOF under the correct event within 3 days of this notice. [Entered: 05/06/2021 08:57 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Transcript Order Form as to Appellant Mark Mann. Duplicate filing/NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN -This Court requires all counsel to file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system, unless exempted for good cause. [Entered: 05/14/2021 12:08 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Gary Lee Printy for Appellant Mark Mann. No hearings. [Entered: 05/06/2021 01:40 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Gary Lee Printy for Appellant Mark Mann. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11445] (ECF: Gary Printy) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:52 PM] |
| Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons & Transcript Order Information form filed by Gary Lee Printy for Mark Mann. Incorrect Event used (Appearance of Counsel) to file documents. Counsel shall resubmit the CIP & TOF under the correct event within 3 days of this notice. [Entered: 05/04/2021 08:44 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gary Lee Printy for Mark Mann. [21-11445] (ECF: Gary Printy) [Entered: 05/03/2021 04:35 PM] |
| **INCORRECT EVENT/FILED IN ERROR**APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gary Lee Printy for Mark Mann. [21-11445]--[Edited 05/04/2021 by TLR] (ECF: Gary Printy) [Entered: 05/03/2021 04:26 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gregg Alan Toomey for Doctor C. Calderon, Corizon Health, Inc., E. Perez Perez and M. Remirez. [21-11445] (ECF: Gregg Toomey) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:38 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Gregg Alan Toomey for Appellees Doctor C. Calderon, Corizon Health, Inc., E. Perez Perez and M. Remirez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11445] (ECF: Gregg Toomey) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:39 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mark Mann on 04/27/2021. Fee Status: PLRA Full Fee Paid. Appellant brief due 40 days from 04/28/2021. [Entered: 04/29/2021 05:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
