Eddie Jones, et al v. Valdosta Police Department, et al
Defendant / Appellee: VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUNE GARTMAN and VALDOSTA GEORGIA, City of
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAREN D. JONES and EDDIE JONES
Case Number: 21-11480
Filed: April 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2021 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 05/27/2021 05:30 PM]
May 24, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Timothy Tanner for June Gartman, Valdosta Georgia and Valdosta Police Department. [21-11480] (ECF: Timothy Tanner) [Entered: 05/24/2021 09:59 AM]
May 24, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Timothy Tanner for Appellees June Gartman, Valdosta Georgia and Valdosta Police Department. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11480] (ECF: Timothy Tanner) [Entered: 05/24/2021 10:16 AM]
May 13, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jody D. Peterman for Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/13/2021 11:09 AM]
May 12, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jody D. Peterman for Appellants Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11480] (ECF: Jody Peterman) [Entered: 05/12/2021 04:46 PM]
May 12, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Jody D. Peterman for Appellants Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. [21-11480] (ECF: Jody Peterman) [Entered: 05/12/2021 04:44 PM]
May 12, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jody D. Peterman for Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. [21-11480] (ECF: Jody Peterman) [Entered: 05/12/2021 04:42 PM]
May 12, 2021 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Jody D. Peterman for Appellants Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. No hearings. [21-11480] (ECF: Jody Peterman) [Entered: 05/12/2021 04:43 PM]
May 3, 2021 Appellate fee was paid on 04/28/2021 as to Appellants Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones. [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:48 PM]
April 28, 2021 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Eddie Jones and Karen D. Jones on 04/28/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/07/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/12/2021 as to Appellant Eddie Jones. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/26/2021 as to Appellees June Gartman and Valdosta Police Department [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eddie Jones, et al v. Valdosta Police Department, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Timothy Tanner
Represented By: Jeremy K. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JUNE GARTMAN
Represented By: Timothy Tanner
Represented By: Jeremy K. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VALDOSTA GEORGIA, City of
Represented By: Timothy Tanner
Represented By: Jeremy K. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KAREN D. JONES
Represented By: Jody D. Peterman
Represented By: Dillon Payne Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: EDDIE JONES
Represented By: Jody D. Peterman
Represented By: Dillon Payne Hanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?