Mario Rodriguez, et al v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MARIO PONCE RODRIGUEZ |
| 21-11582 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 06/21/2021 filed by Mario Ponce Rodriguez. Motion is Unopposed. [9414527-1] [21-11582] (ECF: Howard Sohn) [Entered: 06/18/2021 12:58 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Howard Allan Sohn for Mario Ponce Rodriguez. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both.--[Edited 06/08/2021 by LA to reflect web based CIP has been filed and deficiency is for CIP in CM/ECF only] [Entered: 06/08/2021 02:19 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Howard Allan Sohn for Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11582] (ECF: Howard Sohn) [Entered: 06/08/2021 04:00 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez is GRANTED. [ # 9394137-2 ] COA due on 06/24/2021. KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 06/04/2021 01:02 PM]
|
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Howard Allan Sohn for Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez. No hearings. [Entered: 05/25/2021 02:21 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Phillip DiRosa for Acting United States Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11582] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 05/25/2021 02:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Howard Allan Sohn for Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [21-11582] (ECF: Howard Sohn) [Entered: 05/25/2021 10:44 AM] |
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 06/25/2021 filed by Mario Ponce Rodriguez. Motion is Unopposed. [9394137-1] [21-11582] (ECF: Howard Sohn) [Entered: 05/25/2021 10:42 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Howard Sohn, Counsel for Appellant, Rodriguez Howard Allan Sohn for Mario Ponce Rodriguez. [21-11582] (ECF: Howard Sohn) [Entered: 05/25/2021 10:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Philip DiRosa for USA [21-11582] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 05/21/2021 05:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA. [21-11582] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 05/17/2021 02:14 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez was filed on 03/17/2021. Docket Entry 217. [Entered: 05/12/2021 11:25 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mario Ponce Rodriguez on 05/11/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/12/2021 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
