Rodney Mountjoy v. Christopher Edelene
CHRISTOPHER EDELENE, Colonel |
RODNEY C. MOUNTJOY |
21-11614 |
May 11, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy. [Entered: 06/24/2021 04:36 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Notice to the Court as to Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy. [Entered: 06/23/2021 11:24 AM] |
MOTION for 60-day extension of time to file a motion for leave to proceed in the district court filed by Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9417939-1] [Entered: 06/23/2021 11:03 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rodney C. Mountjoy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:37 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Motion for leave to proceed (Captioned for this Court) as to Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because leave to proceed must be filed in the district court prior to the any motion being renewed in this court. [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:18 PM] |
This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:21 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Supplemental Brief as to Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because supplemental briefs may not be filed without leave of court. Also, as a briefing schedule has not yet issued in this appeal, any motions to supplement the brief will not be entertained at this time. [Entered: 06/08/2021 12:18 PM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Rodney C. Mountjoy. Service date: 05/21/2021. [Entered: 06/07/2021 08:13 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rodney C. Mountjoy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/26/2021 04:09 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rodney C. Mountjoy on 05/10/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 05/13/2021 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Rodney Mountjoy v. Christopher Edelene | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: CHRISTOPHER EDELENE, Colonel | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RODNEY C. MOUNTJOY | |
Represented By: | Rodney C. Mountjoy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.