Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FLORIDA STATE ATTORNEY
Petitioner / Appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Case Number: 21-11680
Filed: May 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2021 Supplemental Motion to vacate court's order [ # 9410188-2 ] filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 07/08/2021 03:45 PM]
July 6, 2021 Notice of receipt: Notice of Filing Motion to Waive Filing Fees as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Proper IFP form required. [Entered: 07/09/2021 09:48 AM]
June 21, 2021 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 06/17/2021. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 06/21/2021 11:11 AM]
June 21, 2021 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 06/17/2021. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 06/21/2021 11:12 AM]
June 21, 2021 USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 06/17/2021. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 06/21/2021 11:20 AM]
June 21, 2021 Docketed in Error***USDC order on limited remand as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir filed on 06/17/2021. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 06/21/2021 11:17 AM]
June 15, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA and U.S. Attorney General. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/15/2021 08:03 AM]
June 10, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Vinodh Raghubir. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/10/2021 08:50 AM]
June 8, 2021 USDC FRAP 4 Motion as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 05/17/2021. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:18 AM]
June 8, 2021 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 06/03/2021. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:50 AM]
June 4, 2021 Notice of receipt: Letter as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir.. [Entered: 06/14/2021 12:26 PM]
June 4, 2021 MOTION to vacate court's order filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9410188-1] [Entered: 06/14/2021 12:27 PM]
June 4, 2021 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. IF IFP IS DENIED IN USDC, SEND LETTER REQUESTING FORM AND AFFIDAVIT.[9410195-1] [Entered: 06/14/2021 12:29 PM]
May 18, 2021 USDC motion for certificate of appealability as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 05/17/2021. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 05/18/2021 03:42 PM]
May 17, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir on 05/17/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/18/2021 03:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA STATE ATTORNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Represented By: Vinodh Raghubir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?