Raymond Torres v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND TORRES
Case Number: 21-11699
Filed: May 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2021 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Torres. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9419159-1] [Entered: 06/24/2021 10:14 AM]
June 16, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/16/2021 09:30 AM]
June 14, 2021 Notice of receipt: Duplicate CIP as to Appellant Raymond Torres.. [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:09 PM]
June 2, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Raymond Torres. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/02/2021 10:43 AM]
June 1, 2021 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Raymond Torres. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9402723-1] [Entered: 06/04/2021 02:24 PM]
June 1, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Raymond Torres. [Entered: 06/03/2021 04:37 PM]
May 20, 2021 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Raymond Torres was filed on 04/07/2021. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:24 PM]
May 18, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Torres on 05/17/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Torres v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: RAYMOND TORRES
Represented By: Raymond Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?