Richard McLeod v. Mike Dewey, et al
| EUGENE OWEN, ED MELTON, JOHN ULM, LONNIE DOE, JOE WHEELER, WILLIE CLEMMONS, MIKE DEWEY, JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, QUITMAN GEORGIA, BROOKS COUNTY, GEORGIA, DAVID CROSBY, BILLY INGRAM, GINGER FORGIONE and LARRY NICHOLS |
| RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD |
| SERVICE |
| 21-11788 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod. [Entered: 07/27/2021 10:14 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Objection to District Court Denial of Right to Appeal as to Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. [Entered: 07/27/2021 10:16 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Darlene Fuller, Filer: Richard J. McLeod, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 07/22/2021, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 04/21/2021. [Entered: 07/22/2021 02:52 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9442396-1] [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:01 PM] |
| THIRD NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Richard Jerry McLeod. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/16/2021 11:38 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Richard J. McLeod, Court Reporter: Darlene Fuller, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 04/21/2021. [Entered: 07/14/2021 10:25 AM] |
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 06/30/2021 02:14 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Richard Jerry McLeod. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/23/2021 12:58 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to W. Brent Hyde for John Ulm, Quitman Georgia, Mike Dewey, Brooks County, Georgia, Joe Wheeler, Eugene Owen, Ed Melton, Lonnie Doe, Willie Clemmons, Jerri Dukes, Becky Rothrock, David Crosby, Billy Ingram and Ginger Forgione. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/21/2021 09:04 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney W. Brent Hyde for Appellees Brooks County, Georgia, Willie Clemmons, David Crosby, Mike Dewey, Lonnie Doe, Jerri Dukes, Ginger Forgione, Billy Ingram, Ed Melton, Eugene Owen, Quitman Georgia, Becky Rothrock, John Ulm and Joe Wheeler. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11788] (ECF: W. Hyde) [Entered: 06/18/2021 12:25 PM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 06/14/2021 11:56 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James Bryant Thagard for Service. [21-11788] (ECF: James Thagard) [Entered: 06/10/2021 02:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Richard Jerry McLeod. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/07/2021 08:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by W. Brent Hyde for Willie Clemmons, Mike Dewey, Lonnie Doe, Ed Melton, Eugene Owen, John Ulm and Joe Wheeler. [21-11788] (ECF: W. Hyde) [Entered: 06/04/2021 04:29 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod was filed on 05/24/2021. Docket Entry 97. [Entered: 05/27/2021 12:17 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Richard J. McLeod, Court Reporter: Darlene Fuller, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 04/21/2021. [Entered: 05/27/2021 12:22 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod on 05/21/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/04/2021 as to Appellant Richard Jerry McLeod. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/18/2021 as to Appellee Mike Dewey [Entered: 05/27/2021 12:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.