Gary Hovind v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
| LINCOLN APARTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| GARY HOVIND |
| 21-11863 |
| May 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Lincoln Apartment Management Limited Partnership and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company [21-11863] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 07/21/2021 06:21 PM] |
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Gary Hovind [21-11863] (ECF: Ralph Hughes) [Entered: 07/15/2021 02:15 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Gary Hovind. [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David M. Atkinson for Lincoln Apartment Management Limited Partnership and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Marissa Holly Merrill for Lincoln Apartment Management Limited Partnership and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. [21-11863] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 06/16/2021 04:57 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11863] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 06/16/2021 05:00 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 06/15/2021 10:28 AM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Gary Hovind. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/06/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/14/2021 09:19 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Ralph E. Hughes for Appellant Gary Hovind. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 06/14/2021 09:00 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ralph E. Hughes for Gary Hovind. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/11/2021 10:49 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ralph E. Hughes for Gary Hovind. [21-11863] (ECF: Ralph Hughes) [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Ralph E. Hughes for Appellant Gary Hovind. [21-11863] (ECF: Ralph Hughes) [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:51 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-11863] (ECF: Ralph Hughes) [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:29 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Gary Hovind on 05/27/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/10/2021 as to Appellant Gary Hovind. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/24/2021 as to Appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company [Entered: 06/02/2021 08:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
