Christine Marfut v. Charlotte County, Florida, et al
| GLENN SIEGAL, RHONDA LEONARD, PROMPT TOWING SERVICE and CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA |
| CHRISTINE E. MARFUT |
| 21-11884 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of receipt: Copy of Motion filed in the District Court as to Appellant Christine E. Marfut. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. [Entered: 07/08/2021 09:45 AM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Christine E. Marfut failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/29/2021 09:08 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christine E. Marfut. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/16/2021 09:17 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christine E. Marfut on 06/01/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/15/2021 as to Appellant Christine E. Marfut [Entered: 06/03/2021 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
