Kultar Goraya v. Secretary, Department of Corr.
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| KULTAR S. GORAYA |
| 21-11962 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for 90-day extension to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Kultar S. Goraya is GRANTED. [ # 9441074-2 ] Filing fee due no later than 11/03/2021. AJ (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 08/05/2021 11:15 AM]
|
| MOTION for extension of time to pay the filing fee filed by Appellant Kultar S. Goraya. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9441074-1] [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:12 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Kultar S. Goraya was filed on 07/06/2021. Docket Entry 47. [Entered: 07/13/2021 08:48 AM] |
| Amended Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9421471-2 ] filed by Appellant Kultar S. Goraya. [Entered: 07/14/2021 11:43 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Department of Corrections. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/08/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Letter from Appellant, Kultar Goraya re: copy of COA motion; Clerk responded [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:42 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Kultar S. Goraya. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9421471-1] [Entered: 06/28/2021 10:29 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kultar S. Goraya. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:37 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Kultar S. Goraya was filed on 05/25/2021. Docket Entry 41. [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:16 PM] |
| USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Kultar S. Goraya was filed on 05/01/2019. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:19 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kultar S. Goraya on 06/07/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kultar Goraya v. Secretary, Department of Corr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: KULTAR S. GORAYA | |
| Represented By: | Kultar S. Goraya |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
