Jose Pagen, Jr. v. Marion County Sheriff Office, et al
| STATE OF FLORIDA, STEVEN ROGERS, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, STATE ATTORNEY, 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida and BILLY WOODS |
| JOSE JUAN PAGEN, JR. |
| 21-11988 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for extension of time to file IFP motion filed by Appellant Jose Juan Pagen, Jr. is GRANTED. [ # 9434958-2 ] IFP motion due on 08/19/2021. JP (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 07/16/2021 09:55 AM]
|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jose Juan Pagen, Jr.. [Entered: 07/14/2021 12:12 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 08/19/2021 filed by Appellant Jose Juan Pagen, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9434958-1] [Entered: 07/14/2021 12:10 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jose Juan Pagen, Jr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:36 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jose Juan Pagen, Jr. on 06/09/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
