Carlos Alonso Cano, et al v. 245 C&C, LLC, et al
| FE MOREJON FERNANDEZ and CARLOS A. ALONSO CANO, as next friend of his minor daughters K.A.M. and J.L.A.M. |
| CFH GROUP, LLC and 245 C&C, LLC |
| 21-12065 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Carlos A. Alonso Cano failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 07/15/2021 10:36 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Carlos A. Alonso Cano. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/09/2021 08:18 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Carlos A. Alonso Cano and Fe Morejon Fernandez on 06/16/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/30/2021 as to Appellant Carlos A. Alonso Cano. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/14/2021 as to Appellee 245 C&C, LLC [Entered: 06/17/2021 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
