Alabama One Credit Union v. Barry Frederick
| ALABAMA ONE CREDIT UNION |
| BARRY V. FREDERICK |
| SERVICE |
| NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-12348 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Barry V. Frederick failed to file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/02/2021 10:04 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kirby, Cason M. on behalf of Appellee, Alabama One Credit Union [21-12348] (ECF: Cason Kirby) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andrew P. Campbell for Alabama One Credit Union. [21-12348] (ECF: Andrew Campbell) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:56 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12348] (ECF: Andrew Campbell) [Entered: 08/09/2021 05:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Andrew Todd Campbell for Alabama One Credit Union. [21-12348] (ECF: Andrew Campbell) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:48 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Elizabeth Holt for Appellees National Credit Union Administration and USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12348] (ECF: Elizabeth Holt) [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:21 AM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Barry V. Frederick. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Party Barry V. Frederick has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 07/29/2021 10:23 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Barry V. Frederick. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/27/2021 11:22 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Elizabeth Holt for USA [21-12348] (ECF: Elizabeth Holt) [Entered: 07/21/2021 10:07 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Barry V. Frederick on 07/12/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 07/26/2021 as to Appellant Barry V. Frederick. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/09/2021 as to Appellee Alabama One Credit Union [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
