Larry Williams v. Warden
| LARRY WILLIAMS |
| WARDEN |
| 21-12516 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Larry Williams. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9473987-1] [21-12516] (ECF: Rodney Zell) [Entered: 08/31/2021 10:38 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 08/03/2021 as to Appellant Larry Williams. [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rodney Zell for Larry Williams. [21-12516] (ECF: Rodney Zell) [Entered: 08/10/2021 06:15 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Rodney Zell for Appellant Larry Williams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12516] (ECF: Rodney Zell) [Entered: 08/10/2021 06:14 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rodney Zell for Larry Williams. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/10/2021 09:48 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Crowder for Appellee Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12516] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 07/30/2021 12:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Crowder for Warden. [21-12516] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 07/29/2021 08:42 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Larry Williams was filed on 06/22/2021. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 07/28/2021 12:19 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Larry Williams on 07/22/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/28/2021 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Larry Williams v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: LARRY WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Rodney Zell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Crowder |
| Represented By: | Beth Attaway Burton |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Represented By: | Paula Khristian Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
