Emory Rickerson v. Rodney Jeter
| EMORY L. RICKERSON |
| RODNEY SCOTT JETER, individually |
| 21-12563 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Emory L. Rickerson v. Rodney Scott Jeter |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for Appellee Rodney Jeter [21-12563] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 09/10/2021 02:39 PM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Attorney Natalie S. Woodward for Appellant Emory L. Rickerson. [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:32 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 08/24/2021 09:49 AM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney William J. Atkins for Appellant Emory L. Rickerson. [21-12563] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 08/18/2021 01:45 PM] |
| Notice of deficient Civil Appeal Statement filed by William J. Atkins for Emory L. Rickerson. The Civil Appeal Statement was due 8/16/21. Please file the Civil Appeal Statement within 7 days of the due date of 8/16/21. [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:01 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Robert B. Shapiro for Appellee Rodney Scott Jeter. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12563] (ECF: Robert Shapiro) [Entered: 08/16/2021 10:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert Shapiro for Rodney Jeter [21-12563] (ECF: Robert Shapiro) [Entered: 08/13/2021 04:08 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12563] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 08/13/2021 08:33 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William J. Atkins for Emory L. Rickerson and Natalie S. Woodward for Emory L. Rickerson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/11/2021 12:56 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 07/23/2021 as to Appellant Emory L. Rickerson. [Entered: 08/02/2021 09:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William J. Atkins for Emory L. Rickerson. [21-12563] (ECF: William Atkins) [Entered: 08/02/2021 03:30 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Emory L. Rickerson on 07/23/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/07/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/10/2021 as to Appellant Emory L. Rickerson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/24/2021 as to Appellee Rodney Scott Jeter [Entered: 08/02/2021 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
