John Doe v. Samford University, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee: SAMFORD UNIVERSITY, MALLORY KRUNTORAD and TIM S. HEBSON
Case Number: 21-12592
Filed: August 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 24, 2022 Summary Doe v. Samford University

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2021 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 09/30/2021 03:41 PM]
September 30, 2021 Supplemental Appendix [1 VOLUMES] filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 09/30/2021 03:44 PM]
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Before the Court is the Motion of Appellees for Extension of Page Limitations. Although Appellees request additional pages in their motion, Appellees are reminded that Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B) allows them to file a response brief containing no more than 13,000 words. Because Appellees have not demonstrated that they need more than the 13,000 words already permitted for a response brief under the Courts rules, the motion is DENIED. [ # 9491654-2 ] KCN (See attached order for complete text) [21-12592, 21-12840] [Entered: 09/27/2021 03:14 PM]
September 23, 2021 MOTION for excess words/pages filed by Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. Motion is Unopposed. [9491654-1] [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 09/23/2021 05:39 PM]
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Before the Court are: (1) Appellees Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot, filed in case no. 21-12592; (2) Plaintiff-Appellants Motion to Consolidate Appeals, filed in case nos. 21- 12592 and 21-12840; and Plaintiff-Appellants Motion to Expedite Time-Sensitive Appeals, filed in case nos. 21-12592 and 21-12840. Appellees Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot is DENIED. Plaintiff-Appellants Motion to Consolidate Appeals is GRANTED. Case no. 21-12592 and Case no. 21-12840 are CONSOLIDATED. Plaintiff-Appellants Motion to Expedite Time-Sensitive Appeals is GRANTED, IN PART, in that the Court sets the following briefing schedule: Appellees are directed to file a consolidated response brief as to both appeals within 21 days after the date of this order. Appellants reply brief is due 14 days after Appellees file their response brief. Additionally, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes, including oral argument if the Court deems oral argument in this case is warranted. The Court takes no position at this time on the appropriateness of oral argument. [ # 9468707-2 ] [ # 9468706-2 ] [ # 9468703-2 ] [ # 9468704-2 ] [ # 9464940-2 ] CRW, RSR and BCG (See attached order for complete text) [21-12592, 21-12840] [Entered: 09/09/2021 03:29 PM]
September 7, 2021 Reply to response filed by Appellant John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 09/07/2021 03:43 PM]
September 7, 2021 Reply to response filed by Appellant John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 09/07/2021 03:42 PM]
September 3, 2021 Reply to response filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 09/03/2021 03:45 PM]
September 1, 2021 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:22 AM]
August 31, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by James Pennington for Appellees Attorney James C. Pennington for Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/31/2021 02:36 PM]
August 31, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James C. Pennington for Samford University, Mallory Kruntorad and Tim S. Hebson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/31/2021 08:46 AM]
August 31, 2021 RESPONSE to Motion to expedite filed by Appellant John Doe [ # 9468707-2 ] filed by Attorney James C. Pennington for Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/31/2021 04:11 PM]
August 31, 2021 Supplemental Appendix filed in support of responses to Appellant's motion to expedite and motion for consolidation [1 VOLUMES] filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592]--[Edited 09/01/2021 by BWH] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/31/2021 05:11 PM]
August 31, 2021 RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellant John Doe [ # 9468703-2 ] filed by Attorney James C. Pennington for Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/31/2021 04:41 PM]
August 30, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [21-12592] (ECF: Brett Knight) [Entered: 08/30/2021 11:22 AM]
August 27, 2021 RESPONSE to Motion to dismiss appeal as moot filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University [ # 9464940-2 ] filed by Attorney Kristina W. Supler for Appellant John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 08/27/2021 09:23 AM]
August 26, 2021 Notice of deficient Brief and Appendix filed by Mr. Richard Stephen Jaffe for John Doe. Documents filed without leave of the Court. The Brief and Appendix were previously filed August 4, 2021. [Entered: 08/26/2021 08:22 AM]
August 25, 2021 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to expedite filed by John Doe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9468707-1] [21-12592] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/25/2021 12:37 PM]
August 25, 2021 Public Communication: Notice to parties: Appellees' responses to Appellant's motion to consolidate appeals and motion to expedite are due August 31, 2021. [21-12592, 21-12840] [Entered: 08/25/2021 03:10 PM]
August 25, 2021 ***DOCUMENT FILED WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE COURT, BRIEF PREVIOUSLY FILED***Appellant's brief filed by John Doe. [21-12592]--[Edited 08/26/2021 by BWH] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/25/2021 04:20 PM]
August 25, 2021 ***DOCUMENT FILED WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE COURT, APPENDIX PREVIOUSLY FILED***Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant John Doe. [21-12592]--[Edited 08/26/2021 by BWH] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/25/2021 04:20 PM]
August 25, 2021 MOTION to consolidate appeals 21-12592 and 21-12840 filed by John Doe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9468703-1] [21-12592] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/25/2021 12:32 PM]
August 24, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Amy Q. Glenos for Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: Amy Glenos) [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:35 PM]
August 20, 2021 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 08/23/2021 11:21 AM]
August 19, 2021 MOTION to dismiss appeal as moot filed by Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9464940-1] [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/19/2021 06:45 PM]
August 19, 2021 Supplemental Appendix in support of Motion to dismiss appeal as moot filed 819/2021 [1 VOLUMES] filed by Appellees Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592]--[Edited 09/01/2021 by BWH] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/19/2021 06:51 PM]
August 18, 2021 Notice of deficient Civil Appeal Statement filed by Mr. Richard Stephen Jaffe for John Doe, Susan Stone for John Doe and Kristina W. Supler for John Doe. The Civil Appeal Statement was due 8/17/21. Please file within 7 days of the due date of 8/17/21. [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:02 AM]
August 18, 2021 Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Kristina W. Supler for John Doe. Please file the Appearance of Counsel form. Please see the 8/5/21notice. [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:38 AM]
August 18, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Susan Stone for John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Susan Stone) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:17 AM]
August 18, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Kristina W. Supler for Appellant John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 08/18/2021 02:01 PM]
August 18, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kristina W. Supler for John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 08/18/2021 01:52 PM]
August 17, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12592] (ECF: Kristina Supler) [Entered: 08/17/2021 04:28 PM]
August 17, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mr. Richard Stephen Jaffe for John Doe. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:03 PM]
August 13, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Pennington for Tim S. Hebson, Mallory Kruntorad and Samford University. [21-12592] (ECF: James Pennington) [Entered: 08/13/2021 09:56 AM]
August 9, 2021 Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant John Doe. [Entered: 08/10/2021 02:32 PM]
August 9, 2021 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant John Doe. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 08/10/2021 02:32 PM]
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to appear pro hac vice filed by Kristina W. Supler is GRANTED by clerk. [9452934-2] [Entered: 08/05/2021 09:10 AM]
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to appear pro hac vice filed by Susan Stone is GRANTED by clerk. [9452922-2] [Entered: 08/05/2021 09:05 AM]
August 4, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mr. Richard Stephen Jaffe for John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/04/2021 10:16 AM]
August 4, 2021 Appellant's brief filed by John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/04/2021 12:58 PM]
August 4, 2021 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant John Doe. [21-12592] (ECF: Richard Jaffe) [Entered: 08/04/2021 01:17 PM]
August 4, 2021 MOTION to appear pro hac vice filed by Attorney Kristina W. Supler for Appellant John Doe. [9452934-1] [Entered: 08/05/2021 09:09 AM]
August 4, 2021 MOTION to appear pro hac vice filed by Attorney Susan Stone for Appellant John Doe. [9452922-1] [Entered: 08/05/2021 09:03 AM]
August 3, 2021 Appellate fee was paid on 08/02/2021 as to Appellant John Doe. [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:34 PM]
August 2, 2021 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Doe on 08/02/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/13/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/16/2021 as to Appellant John Doe. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/30/2021 as to Appellee Tim S. Hebson [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Doe v. Samford University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN DOE
Represented By: Richard Stephen Jaffe
Represented By: Brett H. Knight
Represented By: Susan Stone
Represented By: Kristina W. Supler
Represented By: Brett Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMFORD UNIVERSITY
Represented By: Amy Quick Glenos
Represented By: James C. Pennington
Represented By: Amy Q. Glenos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MALLORY KRUNTORAD
Represented By: Amy Quick Glenos
Represented By: James C. Pennington
Represented By: Amy Q. Glenos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIM S. HEBSON
Represented By: Amy Quick Glenos
Represented By: James C. Pennington
Represented By: Amy Q. Glenos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?