Moussa Diarra v. Georgia Piedmont Technical College, et al
| MOUSSA DIARRA |
| GEORGIA PIEDMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE, Clarkston Campus, MENDOZA-GUERRA, BYRD, individual and official capacity, MELODY M. MADDOX and SUNSHINE PEANUT COMPANY |
| 21-12666 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No motion for reconsideration may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 and all other applicable rules. ELB, RJL and ALB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/13/2021 03:14 PM]
|
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. [Entered: 08/31/2021 10:50 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Moussa Diarra. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/19/2021 03:39 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Moussa Diarra on 08/02/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 08/09/2021 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
