Brian Ponder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
BRIAN LAMAR PONDER |
EXPERIAN |
21-12761 |
August 10, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alex Mitchell for Brian Lamar Ponder. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/05/2021 02:46 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alex Mitchell for Brian Lamar Ponder. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/20/2021 08:57 AM] |
Attorney Alex Mitchell for Appellant Brian Lamar Ponder has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:57 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alex Mitchell for Brian Lamar Ponder. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:56 PM] |
MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction filed by EXPN.L. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9473930-1] [21-12761] (ECF: Gregory Hanthorn) [Entered: 08/31/2021 05:00 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Gregory Russell Hanthorn for Appellee EXPN.L. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12761] (ECF: Gregory Hanthorn) [Entered: 08/31/2021 04:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gregory Russell Hanthorn for EXPN.L. [21-12761] (ECF: Gregory Hanthorn) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:11 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Brian Lamar Ponder on 08/09/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/24/2021 as to Appellant Brian Lamar Ponder. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/07/2021 as to Appellee Experian [Entered: 08/12/2021 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Brian Ponder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: BRIAN LAMAR PONDER | |
Represented By: | Alex Mitchell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: EXPERIAN | |
Represented By: | Gregory Russell Hanthorn |
Represented By: | Michael I. Krause |
Represented By: | Rebecca Crawford Reynolds |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.