In re: Darryl Burke
In re: DARRYL BURKE |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-12824 |
August 16, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Darryl Burke. [Entered: 08/20/2021 04:26 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Darryl Burke. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9465703-1] [Entered: 08/20/2021 04:20 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Darryl Burke. Served 08/12/2021. Fee Status: IFP Pending [Entered: 08/20/2021 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Darryl Burke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: DARRYL BURKE | |
Represented By: | Darryl Burke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Emily M. Smachetti |
Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.