Edwin Jones v. Birmingham, City of
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWIN JONES
Defendant / Appellee: BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF
Case Number: 21-12962
Filed: August 26, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 23, 2022 Edwin Jones v. Birmingham, City of
September 24, 2024 Edwin Jones v. Birmingham, City of

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Edwin Jones. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/22/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/12/2021 08:57 AM]
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Edwin Jones is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9503205-2 ] [Entered: 10/12/2021 07:18 AM]
October 12, 2021 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Scott Thomas Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones. No hearings. [Entered: 10/12/2021 07:17 AM]
October 8, 2021 MOTION for leave to file Transcript Information Form out of time filed by Edwin Jones. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9503222-1] [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 10/08/2021 01:10 PM]
October 8, 2021 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Edwin Jones. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9503205-1] [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 10/08/2021 12:59 PM]
October 7, 2021 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Edwin Jones failed to file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/07/2021 08:50 AM]
October 5, 2021 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 10/05/2021 03:06 PM]
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time filed by Appellant Edwin Jones is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9495680-2 ] [Entered: 09/30/2021 07:24 AM]
September 29, 2021 Appellate fee was paid on 09/29/2021 as to Appellant Edwin Jones. [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:46 PM]
September 29, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Scott Thomas Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones. [Entered: 10/12/2021 07:27 AM]
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Edwin Jones is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9495676-2 ] [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:51 PM]
September 29, 2021 MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time filed by Edwin Jones. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9495680-1] [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:06 PM]
September 29, 2021 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Edwin Jones. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9495676-1] [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:00 PM]
September 28, 2021 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Edwin Jones failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/28/2021 11:39 AM]
September 28, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Scott Thomas Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones will not be accepted by the Court. As noted in the Court's September 15 notice, a motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement Out of Time must be filed with the Civil Appeal Statement attached as an exhibit to the motion. [Entered: 09/28/2021 07:48 AM]
September 27, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Scott Thomas Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones. [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:46 PM]
September 24, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Samantha A. Chandler for Appellee Birmingham, City of. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12962] (ECF: Samantha Chandler) [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:30 PM]
September 24, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Samantha A. Chandler for Birmingham, City of. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/24/2021 09:36 AM]
September 15, 2021 Scott Thomas Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones and Zachary Scott Morro for Appellant Edwin Jones has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 09/15/2021 08:12 AM]
September 14, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-12962] (ECF: Scott Morro) [Entered: 09/14/2021 01:29 PM]
September 14, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Samantha A. Chandler for Birmingham, City of. [21-12962] (ECF: Samantha Chandler) [Entered: 09/14/2021 11:52 AM]
September 10, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Scott Thomas Morro for Edwin Jones and Zachary Scott Morro for Edwin Jones. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/10/2021 08:20 AM]
August 26, 2021 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edwin Jones on 08/26/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/09/2021 as to Appellant Edwin Jones. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/23/2021 as to Appellee Birmingham, City of [Entered: 08/30/2021 03:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edwin Jones v. Birmingham, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: EDWIN JONES
Represented By: Scott Thomas Morro
Represented By: Zachary Scott Morro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF
Represented By: Samantha A. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?