David Long v. Warden, et al
| DAVID HEATH LONG |
| WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 21-13105 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Heath Long. [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:32 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant David Heath Long. [Entered: 10/07/2021 10:42 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Crowder for Appellees Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections and Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13105] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 09/15/2021 12:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Crowder for Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections and Warden. [21-13105] (ECF: Matthew Crowder) [Entered: 09/15/2021 10:54 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant David Heath Long was filed on 09/07/2021. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 09/15/2021 09:08 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Heath Long on 09/07/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/15/2021 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
