Charles Jenkins v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 21-13124
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Charles Jenkins is GRANTED. [ # 9515578-2 ] COA due on 12/06/2021. CRW (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 11/05/2021 09:36 AM]
October 22, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Jenkins. [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:39 PM]
October 22, 2021 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Charles Jenkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9515656-1] [Entered: 10/26/2021 01:07 PM]
October 14, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/14/2021 06:15 PM]
October 4, 2021 MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 12/06/2021 at 05:00 pm filed by Appellant Charles Jenkins. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9515578-1] [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:32 PM]
October 4, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Charles Jenkins. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/04/2021 10:02 AM]
September 22, 2021 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Charles Jenkins was filed on 09/20/2021. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:42 AM]
September 15, 2021 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Charles Jenkins was filed on 08/11/2021. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:52 PM]
September 13, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Jenkins on 09/13/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Jenkins v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES JENKINS
Represented By: Charles Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?