Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
WILHY HARPO-BROWN |
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Official and Individual Capacities, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, Official and Individual Capacities, BO STOREY, Official and Individual Capacities, MARIO DOE, Official and Individual Capacities and SIERRA DOE, Official and Individual Capacities |
21-13177 |
September 13, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. CRW, AJ and ALB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/25/2021 01:21 PM] |
Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant requesting copy of a Sample Brief. [Entered: 10/15/2021 12:31 PM] |
IFP motion inadvertently sent to USCA electronically sent to USDC Clerk to be filed and ruled upon by USDC. [9506836-1] [Entered: 10/14/2021 05:24 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Wilhy Harpo-Brown. [Entered: 10/14/2021 05:22 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Wilhy Harpo-Brown. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:32 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Wilhy Harpo-Brown on 09/13/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 09/21/2021 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.