Steve Austin, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVE AUSTIN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 21-13279
Filed: September 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2021 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Steve Austin, Jr. was filed on 11/17/2021. Docket Entry 42. [Entered: 11/17/2021 03:28 PM]
October 22, 2021 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Steve Austin, Jr. was filed on 10/19/2021. Docket Entry 41. [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:08 PM]
October 18, 2021 Notice of receipt: Notice to Court of filing motion for ifp in district court as to Appellant Steve Austin, Jr.. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:07 PM]
October 18, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Steve Austin, Jr.. [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:05 PM]
October 13, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steve Austin, Jr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/13/2021 12:18 PM]
October 13, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13279] (ECF: Magaly Rodriguez) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:13 AM]
October 13, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Steve Austin, Jr.. [21-13279] (ECF: Magaly Rodriguez) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:32 AM]
September 27, 2021 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR*** USDC motion for certificate of appealability as to Appellant Steve Austin, Jr. was filed on 09/23/2021. Docket Entry 36. --[Edited 09/28/2021 by DSY] [Entered: 09/27/2021 04:14 PM]
September 23, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Steve Austin, Jr. on 09/23/2021 USDC motion pending: MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed on. DE# 36. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/27/2021 04:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Steve Austin, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: STEVE AUSTIN, JR.
Represented By: Steve Austin Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Magaly Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?