David Green v. Gale Thomson, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID KEITH GREEN
Defendant / Appellee: GALE THOMSON, SAMATHA BROWN, PAMELA OSQATHARPE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 21-13368
Filed: September 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2021 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant David Keith Green failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/29/2021 02:58 PM]
October 25, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney James Charles Champlin, IV for Appellees Samatha Brown, Georgia Department of Corrections, Pamela Osqatharpe and Gale Thomson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13368] (ECF: James Champlin) [Entered: 10/25/2021 03:20 PM]
October 25, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James Charles Champlin, IV for Samatha Brown, Georgia Department of Corrections, Pamela Osqatharpe and Gale Thomson. [21-13368] (ECF: James Champlin) [Entered: 10/25/2021 03:07 PM]
October 18, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David Keith Green. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:01 PM]
October 15, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Teaster, Susan E.; Phyllis Gail Thompson (captioned as Gale Thomson); Samantha Brown; Pamela Osgatharp (captioned as Pamela Osqatharpe); Georgia Department of Corrections [21-13368] (ECF: Susan Teaster) [Entered: 10/15/2021 02:14 PM]
October 15, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Susan E. Teaster; Phyllis Gail Thompson (captioned as Gale Thomson); Samantha Brown; Pamela Osgatharp (captioned as Pamela Osqatharpe); Georgia Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13368] (ECF: Susan Teaster) [Entered: 10/15/2021 02:20 PM]
September 28, 2021 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David Keith Green on 09/27/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/12/2021 as to Appellant David Keith Green. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/26/2021 as to Appellee Samatha Brown [Entered: 10/01/2021 11:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Green v. Gale Thomson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID KEITH GREEN
Represented By: David Keith Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GALE THOMSON
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Represented By: James Charles Champlin IV
Represented By: Annette M. Cowart
Represented By: Susan Elizabeth Teaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMATHA BROWN
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Represented By: James Charles Champlin IV
Represented By: Annette M. Cowart
Represented By: Susan Elizabeth Teaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAMELA OSQATHARPE
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Represented By: James Charles Champlin IV
Represented By: Annette M. Cowart
Represented By: Susan Elizabeth Teaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Represented By: James Charles Champlin IV
Represented By: Annette M. Cowart
Represented By: Susan Elizabeth Teaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?