John Ross v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
JOHN PHILIP ROSS |
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
21-13562 |
October 12, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
John Philip Ross v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to and including January 18, 2022, in which to file Appellees brief is GRANTED, with the appendix, if any, due seven (7) days from the filing of the brief. [ # 9548372-2 ] KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:27 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief to 01/18/2022 filed by Commissioner, Social Security Administration. Motion is Unopposed. [9548372-1] [21-13562]--[Edited 12/08/2021 by TAT] (ECF: Robert Windham) [Entered: 12/08/2021 09:18 AM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant John Philip Ross. [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:08 PM] |
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant John Philip Ross. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 12/08/2021 04:08 PM] |
*DUPLICATE / FILED IN ERROR* Appellant's brief filed by John Philip Ross. [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/17/2021 10:16 AM] |
*DUPLICATE / FILED IN ERROR* Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant John Philip Ross. [21-13562]--[Edited 11/18/2021 by TAT] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/17/2021 10:19 AM] |
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Civil Appeal Statement Out of Time filed by Appellant John Philip Ross is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9529608-2 ] [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:47 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Lane Rouse for Appellant John Philip Ross. [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:48 PM] |
Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant John Philip Ross. [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/16/2021 04:11 PM] |
*DUPLICATE / FILED IN ERROR* Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Lane Rouse for Appellant John Philip Ross. [21-13562]--[Edited 11/17/2021 by TAT] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/16/2021 04:16 PM] |
Appellant's brief filed by John Philip Ross. [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:18 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time filed by John Philip Ross. Motion is Unopposed. [9529608-1] [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/12/2021 11:22 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rebecca Ringham for Commissioner of Social Security Administration [21-13562] (ECF: Rebecca Ringham) [Entered: 11/09/2021 10:45 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Rebecca Ringham for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13562] (ECF: Rebecca Ringham) [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:08 PM] |
Attorney Christopher Lane Rouse for Appellant John Philip Ross has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Motion for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time with the complete Civil Appeal Statement attached to the motion as an exhibit is filed. [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:37 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Dalton Windham for Appellee [21-13562] (ECF: Robert Windham) [Entered: 11/05/2021 10:34 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stephanie. Johnson for Appellee [21-13562] (ECF: Stephanie Johnson) [Entered: 11/05/2021 10:38 AM] |
AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 11/05/2021 11:23 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Blake for Commissioner of Social Security [21-13562] (ECF: Richard Blake) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:13 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 10/26/2021 07:16 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Christopher Lane Rouse for Appellant John Philip Ross. No hearings. [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 10/26/2021 07:21 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher Lane Rouse for Appellant John Philip Ross. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13562] (ECF: Christopher Rouse) [Entered: 10/26/2021 07:17 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Philip Ross on 10/12/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/22/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/26/2021 as to Appellant John Philip Ross. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/09/2021 as to Appellee Commissioner, Social Security Administration [Entered: 10/20/2021 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.