Zabora Brown, et al v. Matthew Johns
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZABORA BROWN, Individually, and as the Natural Parent and as next friend Antraveious Payne and ANTRAVEIOUS PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW JOHNS, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Atlanta Police Department and CITY OF ATLANTA
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Case Number: 21-13565
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 4, 2023 Zabora Brown, et al v. City of Atlanta, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Briefing Notice issued to Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/22/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 11/12/2021 11:59 AM]
November 12, 2021 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Samuel L. Starks for Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. No hearings. [21-13565] (ECF: Samuel Starks) [Entered: 11/11/2021 03:38 PM]
November 12, 2021 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Shean DeCarlos Williams for Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. Appellants' brief due on 12/22/2021, with the appendix due seven days from the filing of the brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 11/12/2021 12:19 PM]
November 12, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Staci J. Miller for Service. [21-13565] (ECF: Staci Miller) [Entered: 11/12/2021 01:02 PM]
November 12, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Samuel L. Starks for Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. [21-13565] (ECF: Samuel Starks) [Entered: 11/12/2021 01:50 PM]
November 12, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Shean DeCarlos Williams for Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. [21-13565] (ECF: Samuel Starks) [Entered: 11/12/2021 01:49 PM]
November 10, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Martin Farmer for Matthew Johns and Joseph Henry King, Jr. for Matthew Johns. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/10/2021 04:56 PM]
November 9, 2021 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 11/09/2021 04:41 PM]
November 9, 2021 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 11/09/2021 03:52 PM]
November 9, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Staci J. Miller for Not Party Service. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13565] (ECF: Staci Miller) [Entered: 11/09/2021 11:23 AM]
October 28, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mecca Anderson for Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne, Samuel L. Starks for Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne and Shean DeCarlos Williams for Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/28/2021 04:02 PM]
October 26, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Samuel L. Starks for Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13565] (ECF: Samuel Starks) [Entered: 10/26/2021 02:21 PM]
October 26, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Samuel L. Starks for Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. [21-13565] (ECF: Samuel Starks) [Entered: 10/26/2021 02:50 PM]
October 12, 2021 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne on 10/12/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/26/2021 as to Appellants Zabora Brown and Antraveious Payne. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/09/2021 as to Appellee Matthew Johns [Entered: 10/19/2021 11:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Zabora Brown, et al v. Matthew Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ZABORA BROWN, Individually, and as the Natural Parent and as next friend Antraveious Payne
Represented By: Mecca Anderson
Represented By: Samuel L. Starks
Represented By: Shean DeCarlos Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANTRAVEIOUS PAYNE
Represented By: Mecca Anderson
Represented By: Samuel L. Starks
Represented By: Shean DeCarlos Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MATTHEW JOHNS, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Atlanta Police Department
Represented By: Christopher Martin Farmer
Represented By: Joseph Henry King Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF ATLANTA
Represented By: Staci J. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SERVICE
Represented By: Staci J. Miller
Represented By: Alisha Marie S. Nair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?