Kimberly Regenesis, LLC, et al v. Lee County, Florida
Plaintiff / Appellee: KIMBERLY REGENESIS, LLC and DAMASCUS TRADING COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision
Case Number: 21-13880
Filed: November 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 10, 2023 Summary Kimberly Regenesis, LLC, et al v. Lee County

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2021 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Lee County, Florida. [Entered: 12/27/2021 04:07 PM]
December 22, 2021 Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Lee County, Florida. [Entered: 12/27/2021 12:27 PM]
December 22, 2021 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Lee County, Florida. 5 VOLUMES - 3 COPIES --[Edited 12/29/2021 by GAF] [Entered: 12/27/2021 12:30 PM]
December 21, 2021 Appellant's brief filed by Lee County, Florida. [21-13880] (ECF: Sacha Dyson) [Entered: 12/21/2021 05:47 PM]
December 21, 2021 Appendix filed [5 VOLUMES] by Appellant Lee County, Florida. [21-13880] (ECF: Sacha Dyson) [Entered: 12/21/2021 05:52 PM]
December 14, 2021 7-day Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Sacha Dyson for Appellant Lee County, Florida. Appellants brief due on 12/21/2021 as to Appellant Lee County, Florida. Appendix due on 12/28/2021 as to Appellant Lee County, Florida. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 12/14/2021 09:40 AM]
December 6, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Kellogg Green for Kimberly Regenesis, LLC and Damascus Trading Company, LLC. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). [Entered: 12/06/2021 02:53 PM]
December 2, 2021 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 12/06/2021 10:40 AM]
November 19, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Sacha Dyson for Lee County, Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/19/2021 09:21 AM]
November 19, 2021 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Lee County, Florida. The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/14/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:24 PM]
November 19, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Sacha Dyson for Appellant Lee County, Florida. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-13880] (ECF: Sacha Dyson) [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:38 PM]
November 19, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Sacha Dyson for Appellant Lee County, Florida. [21-13880] (ECF: Sacha Dyson) [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:36 PM]
November 16, 2021 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Sacha Dyson for Appellant Lee County, Florida. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [21-13880] (ECF: Sacha Dyson) [Entered: 11/16/2021 04:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kimberly Regenesis, LLC, et al v. Lee County, Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: KIMBERLY REGENESIS, LLC
Represented By: James Kellogg Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DAMASCUS TRADING COMPANY, LLC
Represented By: James Kellogg Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision
Represented By: Sacha Dyson
Represented By: Benjamin Bard
Represented By: Gregory A. Hearing
Represented By: Julia Corbin Mandell
Represented By: Thomasina Fornash Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?