Jane Snider-Hancox v. NCL Bahamas, Ltd.
| JANE ELIZABETH SNIDER-HANCOX |
| NCL (BAHAMAS), LTD., a Bermuda company |
| 21-14229 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney David Perkins for Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:39 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney David Perkins for Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. Transcript(s) ordered. [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:41 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney David Perkins for Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:20 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney David Perkins for Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:43 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Out of Time (CIP/TOF/CAS) filed by Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9579428-2 ] [Entered: 01/25/2022 04:14 PM]
|
| Public Communication: Attorney Perkins is directed to file the Certificate of Interested Persons, Civil Appeal Statement and Transcript order form on this court's docket within 2 days of today. [Entered: 01/25/2022 04:25 PM] |
| Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox DE #: 301 [Entered: 01/24/2022 12:41 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement, Transcript Information Form, Certificate of Interested Persons, Corporate Disclosure Statement out of time filed by Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9579428-1] [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 01/20/2022 04:14 PM] |
| Court Reporter acknowledgment not filed. Letter issued to Court Reporter Dawn M. Savino as to Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. Transcript is due to be filed in District Court 30 days from 12/17/2021. [Entered: 01/13/2022 04:50 PM] |
| Attorney David Perkins for Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 01/13/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Karl Shires, 12/17/2021, Jane E. Snider-Hancox, Trial 10/12/2021 , Trial 10/13/2021 - 10/14/2021, Trial 10/18/2021. [Entered: 01/13/2022 02:40 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Karl Shires, Filer: Jane E. Snider-Hancox, Dt. Filed: 12/21/2021, Proceeding Type and Date: Trial 10/18/2021 [Entered: 01/13/2022 02:41 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David Perkins for Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 01/13/2022 02:28 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Jane E. Snider-Hancox, Court Reporter: Karl Shires, Proceeding Type and Date: Trial 10/12/2021 , Trial 10/13/2021 - 10/14/2021, Trial 10/18/2021.--[Edited 01/13/2022 by DCB] [Entered: 01/04/2022 05:09 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jack Roy Reiter for Appellee NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14229] (ECF: Jack Reiter) [Entered: 12/30/2021 01:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jack Roy Reiter for NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.. [21-14229] (ECF: Jack Reiter) [Entered: 12/28/2021 05:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David Perkins for Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. [21-14229] (ECF: David Perkins) [Entered: 12/17/2021 08:59 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 12/03/2021 as to Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. [Entered: 12/08/2021 03:58 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox on 12/02/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/17/2021 as to Appellant Jane Elizabeth Snider-Hancox. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/03/2022 as to Appellee NCL (Bahamas), Ltd. [Entered: 12/08/2021 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
