Terrance Goodman v. USA
| TERRANCE D. GOODMAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-14242 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Terrance D. Goodman was filed on 01/14/2022. Docket Entry 797. [Entered: 01/21/2022 11:53 AM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Terrance D. Goodman was filed on 01/03/2022. Docket Entry 795. [Entered: 01/10/2022 05:15 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Terrance D. Goodman. [Entered: 01/03/2022 06:27 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by David L. Goldberg for USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14242] (ECF: David Goldberg) [Entered: 12/17/2021 03:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David L. Goldberg for USA [21-14242] (ECF: David Goldberg) [Entered: 12/16/2021 10:46 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert G. Davies for U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida for USA. [21-14242] (ECF: Robert Davies) [Entered: 12/13/2021 04:57 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Terrance D. Goodman on 12/06/2021. Fee Status: Fee Required. [Entered: 12/09/2021 10:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
