Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden
VINODH RAGHUBIR |
TAYLOR CI WARDEN |
21-14293 |
December 10, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9592977-1] [Entered: 02/07/2022 05:32 PM] |
Notice of Filing and Instruction of Order of Review Documents as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 02/02/2022 08:54 PM] |
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 01/26/2022 03:27 PM] |
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 01/20/2022 03:40 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Vinodh Raghubir and Taylor CI Warden. [Entered: 01/18/2022 04:40 PM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 01/07/2022. Docket Entry 62. [Entered: 01/10/2022 08:44 AM] |
Amended Motion to 11th Circuit Judge and Instruction to the Clerk [ # 9570417-2 ] filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 01/10/2022 05:02 PM] |
Amended Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9559901-2 ] filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 01/10/2022 04:59 PM] |
PREMATURE Corrected Appellant brief filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. Service date: 01/06/2022 email - Appellant Raghubir. [Entered: 01/07/2022 03:29 PM] |
Notice of deficient Appellant brief filed by Party Vinodh Raghubir.Deficiencies: Cover page, certificate of interested persons, oral argument statement, table of content, table of citations, statement of jurisdiction, statement of the issues, statement of the case and a certificate of service. [Entered: 12/30/2021 06:29 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 12/21/2021 07:09 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9559901-1] [Entered: 12/21/2021 07:12 PM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Vinodh Raghubir. Service date: 12/30/2021. [Entered: 12/30/2021 06:27 PM] |
MOTION Motion to 11th circuit judge and instruction to the clerk of the US District court pursuant to FRAP 11 filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9570417-1] [Entered: 01/07/2022 03:16 PM] |
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 12/14/2021. Docket Entry 59. [Entered: 12/14/2021 05:50 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir on 12/10/2021 USDC motion pending: Motion to appeal in forma pauperis filed on 12/10/2021. DE# 57. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/14/2021 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR | |
Represented By: | Vinodh Raghubir |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: TAYLOR CI WARDEN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.