Arnold Ancrum v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
| ARNOLD ANCRUM |
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 21-14312 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Arnold Ancrum was filed on 01/12/2022. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 01/14/2022 12:39 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Department of Corrections. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 01/12/2022 11:11 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Arnold Ancrum. [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:08 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Arnold Ancrum. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). [Entered: 12/29/2021 11:11 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Arnold Ancrum was filed on 11/08/2021. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:17 PM] |
| Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Party Arnold Ancrum. [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:19 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arnold Ancrum on 12/14/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Arnold Ancrum v. Secretary, Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ARNOLD ANCRUM | |
| Represented By: | Arnold Ancrum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
