John Lacombe v. USA
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN LACOMBE
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 21-14423
Filed: December 15, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant John Lacombe failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4; Motion for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal is MOOT due to the clerk's order being entered [ # 9572666-2 ]. [Entered: 01/27/2022 01:13 PM]
January 13, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ryan Karim Buchanan for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14423] (ECF: Ryan Buchanan) [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:04 PM]
January 13, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ryan K. Buchanan for USA [21-14423] (ECF: Ryan Buchanan) [Entered: 01/13/2022 10:31 AM]
January 11, 2022 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Lacombe. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9572666-1] [Entered: 01/11/2022 04:02 PM]
December 30, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to John Lacombe. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). [Entered: 12/30/2021 10:08 AM]
December 22, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lawrence R. Sommerfeld for USA [21-14423] (ECF: Lawrence Sommerfeld) [Entered: 12/22/2021 08:41 AM]
December 15, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Lacombe on 12/14/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/21/2021 02:54 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Lacombe v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JOHN LACOMBE
Represented By: John Lacombe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Lawrence R. Sommerfeld
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia
Represented By: Ryan Karim Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?