Eddie King v. Lawson
| EDDIE JAMES KING |
| LAWSON |
| 21-14492 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of receipt: Motion for IFP sent from the DC as to Appellant Eddie James King. [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for Kristie Lawson [21-14492] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 01/27/2022 01:09 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for Appellee Kristie Lawson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14492] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 01/27/2022 03:07 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Eddie James King. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9583240-1] [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:42 PM] |
| Consent Form filed by Appellant Eddie James King. [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:36 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Eddie James King. [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:31 PM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 09/11/2020. Docket Entry 99. [Entered: 12/30/2021 06:28 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eddie James King on 04/23/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 12/30/2021 06:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
