Demis Espinoza v. Managed Labor Solutions, LLC, et al
| DEMIS ESPINOZA, On behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| MANAGED LABOR SOLUTIONS, LLC and PEOPLEASE, LLC |
| 22-10110 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The joint motions to stay the appeal are GRANTED and the appeal is stayed for thirty days from the date of this order. No later than the end of the thirty days, the parties must file a joint notice of settlement or a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. If the notice or motion is not filed at the end of the thirty days, the initial brief shall be filed no later than April 25, 2022. [ # 9601911-2 ] [ # 9601878-2 ] [ # 9601878-3 ] RJL [Entered: 02/25/2022 04:53 PM]
|
| MOTION Joint Motion, to stay further appellate proceedings filed by Peoplease, LLC. Joint Stipulation of Parties. [9601878-1] [22-10110] (ECF: Matthew Simpson) [Entered: 02/18/2022 12:11 PM] |
| MOTION to stay pending appeal filed by Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. Motion is Unopposed. [9601911-1] [22-10110] (ECF: Mary Ruth Houston) [Entered: 02/18/2022 12:45 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Marc R. Edelman for Demis Espinoza. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/14/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10110] (ECF: Marc Edelman) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:16 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [22-10110, 22-10167] [Entered: 02/09/2022 12:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Garrett Kamen for Peoplease, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: Garrett Kamen) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by JonVieve Hill for Peoplease, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: JonVieve Hill) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:31 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Matthew Rudolph Simpson for Appellant Peoplease, LLC. No hearings. [22-10110] (ECF: Matthew Simpson) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:27 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Rudolph Simpson for Appellant Peoplease, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10110] (ECF: Matthew Simpson) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Matthew Rudolph Simpson for Appellant Peoplease, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: Matthew Simpson) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Matthew Rudolph Simpson for Peoplease, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: Matthew Simpson) [Entered: 01/28/2022 01:19 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Mary Ruth Houston for Appellant Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. No hearings. [22-10110] (ECF: Mary Ruth Houston) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mary Ruth Houston for Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: Mary Ruth Houston) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Mary Ruth Houston for Appellant Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. [22-10110] (ECF: Mary Ruth Houston) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:22 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mary Ruth Houston for Appellant Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10110] (ECF: Mary Ruth Houston) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Marc R. Edelman for Demis Espinoza. [22-10110] (ECF: Marc Edelman) [Entered: 01/27/2022 03:15 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Peoplease, LLC on 01/14/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/23/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/28/2022 as to Appellant Peoplease, LLC. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/11/2022 as to Appellee Demis Espinoza [Entered: 01/20/2022 09:37 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Managed Labor Solutions, LLC on 01/13/2022. Fee Status: Fee Paid. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/22/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/27/2022 as to Appellant Managed Labor Solutions, LLC. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/10/2022 as to Appellee Demis Espinoza [Entered: 01/20/2022 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Demis Espinoza v. Managed Labor Solutions, LLC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: DEMIS ESPINOZA, On behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Marc R. Edelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MANAGED LABOR SOLUTIONS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mary Ruth Houston |
| Represented By: | Adam E. Primm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: PEOPLEASE, LLC | |
| Represented By: | JonVieve Hill |
| Represented By: | Garrett Kamen |
| Represented By: | Matthew Rudolph Simpson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
