Edgina Hendrix-Smith v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
| EDGINA HENDRIX-SMITH |
| CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC. |
| 22-10176 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Edgina Hendrix-Smith failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Edgina Hendrix-Smith has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-2(c), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Edgina Hendrix-Smith failed to file an appendix within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:20 PM]
|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Edgina Hendrix-Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/08/2022 04:33 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edgina Hendrix-Smith on 12/30/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/23/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/28/2022 as to Appellant Edgina Hendrix-Smith [Entered: 01/20/2022 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edgina Hendrix-Smith v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EDGINA HENDRIX-SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Edgina Hendrix-Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
