Rico Ballard v. Jessica Holland, et al
| RICO LAMAR BALLARD |
| JESSICA HOLLAND, individual and official capacity, GD&CP, RUFUS LOGAN, individual and official capacity, GD&CP, A. ELLIS, individual and official capacity, Disciplinary Report Investigator GD&CP, ROLAND, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP, GEORGE BALL, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP and CHARLES HARGROVE, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP |
| 22-10232 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 02/17/2022. Docket Entry 66. [Entered: 03/17/2022 01:05 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel W. Hamilton for Appellees George Ball, A. Ellis, Charles Hargrove, Jessica Holland, Rufus Logan and Roland. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10232] (ECF: Daniel Hamilton) [Entered: 02/17/2022 12:24 PM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard. [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:45 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard. [Entered: 02/14/2022 02:35 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rico Lamar Ballard. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/07/2022 12:48 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rico Lamar Ballard on 01/21/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 01/25/2022 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rico Ballard v. Jessica Holland, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RICO LAMAR BALLARD | |
| Represented By: | Rico Lamar Ballard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JESSICA HOLLAND, individual and official capacity, GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RUFUS LOGAN, individual and official capacity, GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: A. ELLIS, individual and official capacity, Disciplinary Report Investigator GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ROLAND, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GEORGE BALL, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CHARLES HARGROVE, individual and official capacity, SMU GD&CP | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
