USA v. Sammie Moore
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| SAMMIE MOORE, a.k.a. Chicago |
| 22-10380 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Sammie Moore. Motion is Unopposed. [9595812-1] [22-10380] (ECF: Thomas Hawker) [Entered: 02/10/2022 01:20 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Sammie Moore on 02/01/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. [Entered: 02/10/2022 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Sammie Moore | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: SAMMIE MOORE, a.k.a. Chicago | |
| Represented By: | Thomas L. Hawker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
