Doyle Norwood, Sr. v. Board of Pardons et al, et al
| DOYLE ANTHONY NORWOOD, SR. |
| BOARD OF PARDONS ET AL, All Defendants' act under Color of State Law and CHAIR BOARD, Parole Board |
| 22-10388 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:18 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file pay the filing fee to 04/25/2022 filed by Appellant Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9611341-1] [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:14 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. on 02/01/2022. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 02/08/2022 04:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
