Matthew Pennington v. CGH Technologies, Inc.
| MATTHEW PENNINGTON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| CGH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A Foreign For Profit Corporation |
| 22-10478 |
| February 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| No action will be taken on Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 9636903-2 ]. Motion filed by Appellant Matthew Pennington is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements.*The deficiency has not been cured, the motion will not be processed. The party must cure the deficiency and file a new motion to reinstate. [Entered: 04/07/2022 01:13 PM] |
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Matthew Pennington. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9636903-1] [22-10478] (ECF: Matthew Pennington) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:31 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Matthew Pennington. [22-10478]--[Edited 04/07/2022 by TJS] (ECF: Matthew Pennington) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:24 AM] |
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Matthew Pennington. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9629592-1] [22-10478] (ECF: Matthew Pennington) [Entered: 03/27/2022 05:00 PM] |
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Matthew Pennington. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9629593-1] [22-10478] (ECF: Matthew Pennington) [Entered: 03/27/2022 05:12 PM] |
| No action will be taken on Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 9629593-2 ]., Motion to reinstate appeal [ # 9629592-2 ]. Motion filed by Appellant Matthew Pennington is deficient **The deficiency has not been cured, the motion will not be processed. The party must cure the deficiency and file a new motion to reinstate. [Entered: 03/28/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Attorney Paul Kennedy for Appellee CGH Technologies, Inc.. Address hasnot been verified or updated, and mail has not been re-sent. IN RE: 3/3/22 DIS-2 Letter [Entered: 03/17/2022 04:00 PM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Attorney Paul Kennedy for Appellee CGH Technologies, Inc.. Address has not been verified or updated, and mail has not been re-sent. IN RE: 2/16/22 DKT-2 [Entered: 03/17/2022 03:58 PM] |
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Matthew Pennington failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules; ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Matthew Pennington failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 [Entered: 03/03/2022 09:32 AM]
|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Nancy A. Johnson for CGH Technologies, Inc.. [22-10478] (ECF: Nancy Johnson) [Entered: 03/02/2022 08:27 PM] |
|
ORDER: Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by David Victor Barszcz is GRANTED by clerk. Attorneys terminated: Attorneys David Victor Barszcz and Mary Evelyn Lytle for Appellant Matthew Pennington in 22-10478. [Entered: 02/17/2022 02:41 PM]
|
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney David Victor Barszcz for Appellant Matthew Pennington. Motion is Unopposed [9600346-1] [22-10478] (ECF: David Barszcz) [Entered: 02/16/2022 05:06 PM] |
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney David Victor Barszcz for Appellant Matthew Pennington. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9600370-1] [22-10478] (ECF: David Barszcz) [Entered: 02/16/2022 05:28 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Matthew Pennington on 02/10/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/02/2022 as to Appellant Matthew Pennington. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/16/2022 as to Appellee CGH Technologies, Inc. [Entered: 02/16/2022 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Matthew Pennington v. CGH Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MATTHEW PENNINGTON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Pennington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CGH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A Foreign For Profit Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jason Devon Byrd Jr. |
| Represented By: | Nancy A. Johnson |
| Represented By: | Paul Kennedy |
| Represented By: | Christiane Mary McKnight |
| Represented By: | Christopher Kip Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
