Skender Hoti v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
| SKENDER HOTI |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE |
| SERVICE |
| 22-10535 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Skender Hoti. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/31/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/18/2022 02:46 PM] |
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Skender Hoti is GRANTED. [ # 9635493-2 ]; Motion requesting leave to discontinue electronic filing filed by Appellant Skender Hoti is GRANTED. [ # 9635493-3 ] RSR and BCG (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/18/2022 01:06 PM]
|
| MOTION to reinstate appeal, Permission to Discontinue ECF filed by Appellant Skender Hoti. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9635493-1] [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Carri Leininger for Appellee Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10535] (ECF: Carri Leininger) [Entered: 03/22/2022 05:07 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 03/22/2022 as to Appellant Skender Hoti. [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:29 AM] |
|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Skender Hoti failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/21/2022 04:02 PM]
|
| Notice of Mandatory ECF sent to Skender Hoti. [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Skender Hoti. [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:07 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Skender Hoti. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/10/2022 04:49 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Skender Hoti. No hearings. [Entered: 03/11/2022 01:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Carri S. Leininger for Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office [22-10535] (ECF: Carri Leininger) [Entered: 02/25/2022 03:00 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Skender Hoti on 02/18/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/09/2022 as to Appellant Skender Hoti. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/23/2022 as to Appellee Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
