Fernando Hinestroza v. Florida Department of Corrections
| FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
| 22-10560 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Fernando Ivan Hinestroza. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9647887-1] [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:56 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Fernando Ivan Hinestroza. [Entered: 03/23/2022 01:56 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Fernando Ivan Hinestroza. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/21/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney MaryEllen M. Farrell for Appellee Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10560] (ECF: MaryEllen Farrell) [Entered: 03/07/2022 10:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by MaryEllen M. Farrell for Florida Department of Corrections. [22-10560] (ECF: MaryEllen Farrell) [Entered: 03/03/2022 02:39 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Fernando Ivan Hinestroza was filed on 01/31/2022. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 03/02/2022 08:15 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Fernando Ivan Hinestroza on 02/22/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 03/02/2022 08:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fernando Hinestroza v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA | |
| Represented By: | Fernando Ivan Hinestroza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | MaryEllen M. Farrell |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
