Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
| WASEEM DAKER |
| TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner, GREGORY DOZIER, former Commissioner, JACK KOON, Facilities Director, STEVE UPTON, Deputy Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director, JENNIFER AMMONS, General Counsel, ROBERT E. JONES, former General Counsel, BRIAN S. WILSON, Assistant Counsel, ERIN WRIGHT, Assistant Counsel, JASON MITCHELL, Assistant Counsel, KEVIN PARKER, Assistant Counsel, JAMILA COLEMAN, Assistant Counsel, JAMIE A. VALLEE, Paralegal a.k.a JAMIE A O'STEEN, TONI FEDROWIZ, Paralegal, KARESSA JOHN, Paralegal, LASHELL DAVIS, Paralegal, CHARIS DORSEY, Paralegal, LISA FOUNTAIN, Director, Inmate Affairs Unit, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ("OPS"), ROBERT TOOLE, Regional Director and former Warden, SCOTT CRICKMAR, Regional Director, DEPUTY REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ("GDC"), GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN, SUPERINTENDENT, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC & CLASSIFICATION PRISON ("GDCP"), STANLEY WILLIAMS, former Warden, DEPUTY WARDEN OF SECURITY, DEPUTY WARDEN OF CARE & TREATMENT, JANET BREWTON, former Deputy Warden of Care & Treatment, JOHN PAUL, former Deputy of Care & Treatment, DEPUTY WARDEN OF ADMINISTRATION, TARMARSHE SMITH, Unit Manager and former Chief of Security, JOSEPH HUTCHESON, Unit Manager and former Chief of Security, MICHAEL ANDERSON, Unit Manager and former Chief of Security, ROY ODOM, Unit Manager and former Chief of Security, SANDY JACKSON, Chief of Security, FRED WILSON, Chief Counselor/Grievance Coordinator, CALVIN MILTON SMITH, former Chief Counselor/Grienvance Coordinator, JACQUELINE AYENI, former Chief Counselor/Grienvance Coordinator, JEFFREY SIKES, Counselor/Grievance Coordinator, KRISTY PARKER, Counseling Secretary/Grievance Coordinator, CARRIE JAMES, Administrative Assistant, RONNIE SHUEMAKE, CORY OSBORNE, CLARENCE WILLIAMS, CERT Guard, ERSELL MCCULLEN, ADAM SINGLETARY, SHATOYA FUGITT, JOANIE MONK, JERRY LUNDY, CERT Guard, BENJAMIN WARREN, CERT Guard, CALO WATKINS, CERT Guard, GEOFFREY THURMAN, CERT Guard, TARAL TODMAN, CERT Guard, CARLTON A. MURPHY, CERT Guard, BRYAN WHITE, CERT Guard, MICHAEL MENDEZ, CERT Guard, TIMOTHY BROOKS, CERT Guard, CURMIT WILLIAMS, CERT Guard, FNU SCOTT, CERT Guard, JAIME CLEMENTE, CERT Guard, MARCUS MIKELL, CERT Guard, FNU BRADLEY, CERT Guard, FNU ASCENCIO, CERT Guard, MARK ZIMMERMAN, CERT Guard, MICHAEL POWELL, CERT Guard, LANE, Guard, DARREL GORDON, Guard, DAKOTA LEE EDENFIELD, Guard, EDWARD ROOKS, Guard, JOHN DOES, 1-3, Cobra Unit Guards, Georgia State Prison ("GSP"), GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, former Warden, PETER EADDIE, Deputy Warden, Security, TIMOTHY SALES, Deputy Warden, Security, LACHAKA MCKENZIE, Deputy Warden Care & Treatment, FNU LAKE, Deputy Warden, Administration, CLARENCE KEGLER, Unit Manager, FNU JACKSON, Unit Manager, FNU RIVERS, Unit Manager, TRAVIS WRIGHT, Chief of Security, FNU STREETER, Chief Counselor, BROWN, FNU, Law Librarian, ROBIN KIMBREL, Administrative Assistant, VERANDA CLADD, former Administrative Assistant, SHERMAN CHILDS, CERT Guard, CORAY LOCKETT, CERT Guard, AVERY WILLIAMS, CERT Guard, KENNETH BLACK, CERT Guard, JOHNSON, FNU, CERT Guard, MOSELY, FNU, CERT Guard, JANE DOE, MSP, CERT Guard, LAWRENCE WITTINGTON, Special Assistant to the Warden, DARREN JACKSON, Deputy Warden Security, SHROPSHIRE, Deputy Warden Care and Treatment, AARON PINEIRO, Deputy Warden Care and Treatment, LEN GIBSON, Deputy Warden, Administration, ALLEN, Unit Manager, MILES, Chief of Security, DAVIS, Chief Counselor, BROCKINGTON, Chief Counselor, RICHARDSON, Counselor/Acting Law Librarian, BROWN, Counselor/Acting Law Librarian, STEPHANIE POWELL, Administrative Assistant, BILLY SANCHEZ, FOSTER, CERT Guard and AUBREY WILLIAMS, CERT Guard |
| 22-10632 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Waseem Daker. [Entered: 04/20/2022 09:20 AM] |
| "Motion for appointment of counsel" filed by Appellant Waseem Daker. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9648171-1] [Entered: 04/20/2022 09:33 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 03/17/2022 as to Appellant Waseem Daker. [Entered: 03/23/2022 11:51 AM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Waseem Daker. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/06/2022. [Entered: 03/23/2022 12:22 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Waseem Daker. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:14 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Waseem Daker on 02/25/2022. Fee Status: Three Strikes.. [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
