Edward Jeffus v. United States of America, et al
EDWARD DANE JEFFUS |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and EVERGLADES CI WARDEN |
22-10640 |
March 1, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Edward Dane Jeffus. [Entered: 04/26/2022 08:39 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Edward Dane Jeffus. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:39 AM] |
This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:48 AM] |
AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Alix I. Cohen for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10640] (ECF: Alix Cohen) [Entered: 04/07/2022 01:06 PM] |
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellee USA [22-10640] (ECF: Alix Cohen) [Entered: 04/07/2022 01:15 PM] |
MOTION to consolidate appeals 21-10202 and 22-10640, for release pending appeal, to supplement the record filed by Appellant Edward Dane Jeffus in 21-10202, 22-10640. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9640992-1] [21-10202, 22-10640] [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:58 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alix Cohen for USA [22-10640] (ECF: Alix Cohen) [Entered: 04/01/2022 09:56 AM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Edward Dane Jeffus. [Entered: 03/31/2022 04:06 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Edward Dane Jeffus in 22-10640. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-10640, 21-10202] [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:37 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Brittany K. Bull for United States Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10640] (ECF: Brittany Bull) [Entered: 03/15/2022 01:45 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brittany Bull for USA [22-10640] (ECF: Brittany Bull) [Entered: 03/11/2022 01:25 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lisa Tobin Rubio for USA [22-10640] (ECF: Lisa Rubio) [Entered: 03/03/2022 10:24 AM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edward Dane Jeffus on 03/01/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/02/2022 02:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.