Rayvon Boatman v. Administrative Director (FCCC), et al
| RAYVON BOATMAN, a.k.a. Lavon Lee Boatman |
| ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR (FCCC), ASSISTANT TO CLINICAL DIRECTOR (FCCC), DIRECTOR OF MENTAL HEALTH (FCCC), CLINICAL TEAM LEADER, EMPLOYEE/LIBRARY STAFF/RECREATION THERAPIST, M. JOHNSON, GEO CARE GROUP, INC., FCCC GRIEVANCE EXAMINER, SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR PROGRAM DIRECTORS, BILLING, COCHRAN, LYLES, MAURO & RAMSEY, P.A., DCF and WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS |
| 22-10683 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Detainee - Conditions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Rayvon Boatman failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:52 PM]
|
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rayvon Boatman on 03/02/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/22/2022 as to Appellant Rayvon Boatman [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Rayvon Boatman failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:52 PM]