Arthur Malloy v. Julia Weller, et al
| ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY |
| JULIA JORDAN WELLER, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Alabama, sued in her Individual and Official Capacity, TOM PARKER, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama, sued in his Individual and Official Capacity and ALABAMA SUPREME COURT |
| 22-10766 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| No action will be taken on Motion for leave to proceed [ # 9651718-2 ]. Motion filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements, the form is incomplete and must be corrected. [Entered: 04/24/2022 10:46 AM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Arthur Brennan Malloy. [Entered: 04/24/2022 10:54 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed construed from consent form filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9651718-1] [Entered: 04/24/2022 10:44 AM] |
| Consent Form filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy. [Entered: 04/24/2022 10:42 AM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 03/28/2022. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 04/01/2022 05:57 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy. [Entered: 04/03/2022 04:07 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Arthur Brennan Malloy. No hearings. [Entered: 03/23/2022 08:32 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Arthur Brennan Malloy on 03/09/2022. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion Pending: Motion for Special Order to Pay Appellate Docketing Fee 03/09/2022. [Entered: 03/15/2022 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Arthur Malloy v. Julia Weller, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY | |
| Represented By: | Arthur Brennan Malloy |
| Represented By: | Donaldson CF Warden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JULIA JORDAN WELLER, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Alabama, sued in her Individual and Official Capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TOM PARKER, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama, sued in his Individual and Official Capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALABAMA SUPREME COURT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
