David Lola v. Monroe County Sheriff, et al
DAVID JAMES LOLA |
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, Rick Ramsey, individually and as Monroe County Sheriff, ARAMARK, INC., a corporation of unknown origin, ANNE SWEENEY, individually and as Sheriff's Officer, MAYOR OF KEY WEST, Craig Gates, individually and as Mayor of Key West, RICHARD IYALA, individually and as corporate officer of Aramark, Inc., DARLENE MCCLOUD, OFFICER 8187, individually and as Deputy Sheriff, OFFICER 0237, individually and as Deputy Sheriff, MARY EVALEZ, individually and as Monroe County Detention Center committee member, DOE 1, individually and as Monroe County Detention Center committee member, OFFICER 8770, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff, DEPUTY SHERIFF PENNIGEA, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff, DEPUTY SHERIFF TORRES, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff, KEENA ALLEN, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff, RICI, individually and as Aramark, Inc employee, JEAN, inidividually and as Aramark, Inc employee, MR. B, inidividually and as Aramark corporation, COMMANDER OF THE MONROE COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, Major Tim Age, individually and as Commander of Corrections Bureau, MONROE COUNTY, a county in Florida, OFFICER CARRIE, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff in charge of classification, OFFICER CAMERA, individually and as Monroe County Deputy Sheriff, Unit F, STEVEN KATZ, DEPUTY SHERIFF CAMARA, individually, LARRY CAREY, ANTHONY PANIGUA, SERGIO CAMERO, JEAN CARINO and RICARDO BATALIER |
22-10810 |
March 16, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Sergio Camero, Larry Carey, Deputy Sheriff Torres, Steven Katz, Darlene McCloud, Anthony Panigua and Anne Sweeney [22-10810] (ECF: Adriana Jisa) [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:38 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Adriana Jisa for Sergio Camero, Larry Carey, Deputy Sheriff Torres, Steven Katz, Darlene McCloud, Officer 0237, Officer 8770, Anthony Panigua and Anne Sweeney. [22-10810] (ECF: Adriana Jisa) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:38 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Adriana Jisa for Appellees Sergio Camero, Larry Carey, Deputy Sheriff Torres, Steven Katz, Darlene McCloud, Officer 0237, Officer 8770, Anthony Panigua and Anne Sweeney. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10810] (ECF: Adriana Jisa) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:40 AM] |
Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Adriana Jisa for Anne Sweeney, Darlene McCloud, Deputy Sheriff Torres, Steven Katz, Sergio Camero, Officer 0237, Officer 8770, Larry Carey and Anthony Panigua. Document Not Complete as to the parties listed you represent and a Certificate of Interested Persons must be filed separatey. Counsel must file a corrected Appearance of Counsel form and a Certificate of Interested Persons. [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:08 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Adriana Jisa for Sergio Camero, Larry Carey, Deputy Sheriff Torres, Steven Katz, Darlene McCloud, Officer 0237, Officer 8770, Anthony Panigua and Anne Sweeney. [22-10810] (ECF: Adriana Jisa) [Entered: 04/15/2022 10:38 AM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to David James Lola. [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:29 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David James Lola. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:39 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant David James Lola on 03/14/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 03/24/2022 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.